Penalty u/s 271(1)(c)- additions u/s 68 - the contention of the ...

Income Tax

August 9, 2016

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c)- additions u/s 68 - the contention of the assessee cannot be straightway rejected that such error may occur due to software problem - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c)- additions u/s 68 - the contention of the ...

Income Tax

August 9, 2016

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Addition u/s 68 - Head changed from income under “PGBP” (as shown by the assessee) to addition U/s 68 - That there was some tax sought to be...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - penalty cannot be levied where a bonafide claim of the assessee was rejected by the tax department. - AT

Deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Issues on basis of which ALP shown by the assessee has been rejected are debatable - No penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has accepted the additions made in the assessment does not by itself justify the imposition of penalty for concealment - AT

Addition u/s 68 - the additional ground raised by the assessee that addition cannot be made u/s 68 of the Act on the basis of the bank statement is rejected.

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - Penalty has been levied in a mechanical manner without application of mind. In our view, this is a serious mistake in the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - loan from friends and relatives for financing his son’s USA visa - when the evidences and explanation furnished in support of cash credits are...

Quick Updates: