If CIT finds, while examining the records of an assessment order ...

Income Tax

October 6, 2016

If CIT finds, while examining the records of an assessment order u/s 263, that AO has not initiated penalty proceedings, he cannot direct initiation of penalty proceedings because penalty proceedings are not a part of assessment proceedings - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

If CIT finds, while examining the records of an assessment order ...

Income Tax

October 6, 2016

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB(1A) - The mandate under section 263 of the Act do not give any power to CIT to impose his satisfaction over the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - in the assessment order, AO has made it clear that penalty proceedings are initiated separately for furnishing...

Levy of penalties u/s 271D and 271E for the violation of sections 269SS and 269T, respectively - The Tribunal, after reviewing precedents from the Supreme Court and...

Penalty proceedings for a default committed by a deceased - legal representatives - Levy of penalty u/s 271B for non-furnishing of Tax Audit Report within the prescribed...

Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Validity of notice - It is a well settled proposition of law that penalty cannot be initiated for the limb, which is different from the limb for...

Proper officer - Jurisdiction of Initiate investigation proceedings by the Central GST and State GST authorities simultaneously - cross-empowerment - The Court found...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271D - contravention of provisions of section 269SS - the AO initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) and there is no satisfaction recorded...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective notice - The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the AO did not apply his mind...

Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

Quick Updates: