Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2017 Year 2017 This

Incorrect import manifest - There is no doubt that goods have ...


No Evidence for Unrecorded Goods: Section 111(g) Confiscation Unlawful Without Proof Against Appointed Custodian.

March 4, 2017

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Incorrect import manifest - There is no doubt that goods have been unloaded, whether inadvertently or otherwise, but there is no allegation that these were not inventorised in the records of the duly appointed custodian. In the absence of any such evidence, invoking of section 111(g) for confiscation is not in accordance with law - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Smuggling - Burden of proof - Confiscation of Silver Jewellery, Silver Boondi & Indian Currency - The Tribunal's decision emphasized the lack of evidence and failure to...

  2. Smuggling - Seized 2332.800 gm of foreign marked gold - confiscation - Burden of proof - The Tribunal held that the appellant’s have satisfactorily discharged the burden...

  3. Proof of smuggling of goods - DW.1 (revenue officer) stated in evidence that it was suspected that articles were smuggled and that it was believed that the articles were...

  4. Seizure of goods as smuggled into the country from Myanmar u/s 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The burden of proof lies on the respondent u/s 123 to show that the seized...

  5. Liability of Custodian to pay demand duty - Goods lost from the custody of the custodian, CONCOR - CONCOR, as the custodian, was held liable for the duty on the pilfered...

  6. Seizure - Burden of proof - ‘reasonable belief’ - Onus for proving the goods to be not smuggled - Seizure outside the ‘customs area’ - The Tribunal noted that the burden...

  7. Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

  8. Initiation of CIRP - Whether the WhatsApp conversation between the Parties can be admitted as evidence? - The proof of service through electronic mode would not form...

  9. Investigation revealed fraudulent Cenvat Credit claims involving fake invoices without actual supply of goods from April 2016 to June 2017. Evidence indicated non-supply...

  10. The NCLAT held that the NCLT erred in unilaterally changing the appointed date from 1.4.2019 to 1.4.2020 while admitting the scheme of arrangement. The application was...

  11. Exemption from Establishment Charges from the Custodians - there is dispute that all the four respondents have been appointed/ notified as ‘Custodians’ well before the...

  12. This case deals with the valuation of 'rough diamonds' imported into India and the subsequent discrepancy between the declared value and the reassessed value by customs...

  13. The case involved the scope for retention of penalty u/s 112 of Customs Act, 1962 after liability to confiscation was set aside. Confiscation pertains to goods, while...

  14. Over-valuation of rough diamonds imported from Dubai/Hong Kong - in the entire investigation, not a tip of evidence in support of this allegation was adduced. There is...

  15. Levy of penalty - Proceedings against the Custodian / Cargo Service provider - it is alleged that appellants had allowed the cargo to move into the sterile area without...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates