Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - opportunities were ...

Income Tax

May 13, 2017

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - opportunities were provided by the AO to the assessee to substantiate its claim and to disprove the contention of the non-confirming party but the assessee failed to show any initiative as it had not shown any willingness for crossverification and cross-examination of the said party - penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - opportunities were ...

Income Tax

May 13, 2017

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c)- additions u/s 68 - the contention of the assessee cannot be straightway rejected that such error may occur due to software problem - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Addition u/s 68 - Head changed from income under “PGBP” (as shown by the assessee) to addition U/s 68 - That there was some tax sought to be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - Penalty has been levied in a mechanical manner without application of mind. In our view, this is a serious mistake in the...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Denial of exemption of capital gains u/s 10(38) on account of sale of shares - The Tribunal also emphasized that the Revenue had failed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AO has not unearthed any new fact from his independent sources which could lead to furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act – Inaccurate particulars furnished - different stands taken before the AO and appellate authority - assessee did not come out clean -...

Quick Updates: