Refund claim - unjust enrichment - If the burden of Excise Duty ...

High Court Rules Positive Evidence Sufficient for Excise Duty Refund Claim; Rejects Focus on Negative Evidence by Authorities.

September 14, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - If the burden of Excise Duty is passed on to the others, it gets reflected in the Bills and invoices. That is a positive evidence. That was produced to show that no such burden is passed off - the adjudicating and appellate authority have gone about looking for negative evidence. Clearly, the very approach is wrong - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - If the burden of Excise Duty ...

High Court Rules Positive Evidence Sufficient for Excise Duty Refund Claim; Rejects Focus on Negative Evidence by Authorities.

September 14, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

100% EOU - de-bonding - refund of the excise duty previously paid - Admittedly, such duty was paid at the time of what is referred to de-bonding. However, this would not...

CESTAT allowed appeal regarding refund of erroneously paid excise duty on imported SKO. Appellant substantiated claim through PLA records, TR-6 challans, invoices, and...

Refund of Terminal Excise Duties - deemed export benefits - sub-contractor - the claim of refund of Terminal Excise Duty is dependent upon the name of the Appellant...

100% EOU - Refund of excess self-assessed Excise duty - During the intervening period between the date of no objection certificate by the Central Excise Authorities and...

Refund claim - excise duty paid wrongly - The entry was made debiting the excise duty without actually collecting the excise duty - they have not paid the excise duty...

Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

The appellants claimed that the entire amount of service tax paid by them should be considered as a deposit u/s 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and sought a refund....

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

The case involved a dispute over a refund claim u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Appellate Tribunal held that the time limitation for filing the refund claim did...

Refund of SAD - The appellant, a trader, imported goods and claimed a refund on the paid Special Additional Duty (SAD). However, the refund claims were rejected by the...

Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case...

Refund - Concessional rate of duty - In any event, merits of the refund claim of the petitioner would require a proper determination on facts and therefore, the second...

The CESTAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant seeking refund of central excise duty u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's claim for refund on...

Quick Updates: