Penalty u/r 26 of CER - Rule 26 would apply directly in the case ...

Appellant Penalized u/r 26 for Possession of Undutied Fans, Violating Central Excise Rules on Duty Liability.

September 10, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Penalty u/r 26 of CER - Rule 26 would apply directly in the case in hand, as appellant is the person who acquired the possession of goods and were concerned with depositing or keeping the fans on which admittedly duty liability was not discharged.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/r 26 of CER - Rule 26 would apply directly in the case ...

Appellant Penalized u/r 26 for Possession of Undutied Fans, Violating Central Excise Rules on Duty Liability.

September 10, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Clandestine removal of excisable goods - Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on Managing Director. Appellant challenged Order upholding penalty without...

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus Cenvatable invoices issued - the appellant was liable to pay penalty - AT

Levy of penalty u/r 26 - Personal penalty for abatement in evasion of duty - a plain reading of Rule 26 indicates that imposition of the penalty therein is not tied to a...

Confiscation of land, buildings etc. - invocation of powers under Rule 173(Q)(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 on 26.03.2007 and 29.03.2007 for confiscation of land,...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

Penalty imposed u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 set aside due to violation of principles of natural justice and lack of evidence. Department's case based solely on...

Levy of penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent passing of cenvat Credit - it is clearly established that the appellant has facilitated by only issuing...

Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

Levy of penalty in the absence of confiscation - penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 even in case where there is no proposal for confiscation can be...

Levy of penalty on Broker for abetment - penalty under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules cannot be levied - It have nowhere been found that the appellants have acquired...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Levy of Penalty - Perusal of Rule 26 makes it abundantly clear that unless and until there is sufficient evidence about the mens area/ intent on the part of the...

Quick Updates: