Even though the AO may say so that the petitioner is not ...

Petitioners can challenge jurisdiction on appeal, even if the Assessing Officer disagrees. Legal rights upheld.

September 13, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Even though the AO may say so that the petitioner is not entitled to raise the question of jurisdiction, while filing the appeal, but that will not prevent the petitioner from raising such ground, if the same is available to him in accordance with law.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Even though the AO may say so that the petitioner is not ...

Petitioners can challenge jurisdiction on appeal, even if the Assessing Officer disagrees. Legal rights upheld.

September 13, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, a legal practitioner, quashing the service tax demand notice for income derived from legal services. The court held that as an...

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the assessment order u/s 144C of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer clarified that the impugned order was passed...

Reopening proceedings against non-existent entity/ partnership firm -The case revolves around the jurisdictional issue arising from actions taken by the assessing...

Impugned order set aside, matter remitted back to Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. Assessing Officer rejected claim based on Tax Audit Report not being duly...

The Court rejected the petitioner's challenge to the show cause notice (SCN) issued u/s 74 of the CGST Act on jurisdictional grounds. The petitioner failed to submit a...

Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - Reply of the assessee through reproduced but the contents thereof are not even referred or analyzed...

The petitioner challenged orders u/s 62 of the TNGST Act for failing to furnish returns from April to July 2023 within the prescribed period. The High Court held that...

The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the legal right of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) to challenge auction proceedings of properties owned by the HUF. The court...

Assessment proceedings against one of the legal heirs - deceased/assessee had admittedly more than one legal representatives - Despite the legal heir's explicit...

Deduction claimed u/s 57 against income returned u/s 56 - manner of apportioning assessee's expenses to earning income u/s 56 disputed - Revenue authorities rejecting...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Period of limitation - denial of deduction u/s 11 - As the petitioner was well aware of the fact that this is the case of filling of inaccurate...

Validity of Reopening of assessment - If an assessee has to challenge the existence of the belief, the same can be done so in a proceedings under Article 226 of the...

Revision u/s 263 - bogus purchase - proof of nexus between the purchases and sales - once submission/reply filed by the assessee, pursuant to enquiry by the Assessing...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Quick Updates: