Profiteering - contravention of the provisions of Section 171 of ...

Entity Profiteering Violation: Maybelline Fails to Pass CGST Section 171 Tax Cut Benefits to Consumers on FIT Me Foundation.

September 27, 2018

Case Laws GST NAPA

Profiteering - contravention of the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 - Benefit of reduction in the rate of tax by lowering the price of “Maybelline FIT Me foundation” not passed on to recipients - by no stretch of imagination he can pocket this reduction to the detriment of the ordinary consumer.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - contravention of the provisions of Section 171 of ...

Entity Profiteering Violation: Maybelline Fails to Pass CGST Section 171 Tax Cut Benefits to Consumers on FIT Me Foundation.

September 27, 2018

Case Laws GST NAPA

You may also like:

Profiteering - restaurant service - reduction in rate of GST - every recipient/ customer is entitled to the benefit of the tax rate reduction by way of reduced prices...

Profiteering - allegation is that the benefit of reduction on the ITC not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in the price - The Respondent cannot deny the...

Profiteering - supply of “Snacks” - benefit of reduction in the rate of tax not passed on - Profiteering proceedings are only concerned with ascertaining whether the...

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - it is alleged that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchased a flat in the Respondent's project - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of...

Profiteering - restaurant service - benefit of reduction of tax from 18% to 5% not passed to customers - applicant could not establish profiteering for want of credible evidence

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by him by way of commensurate reduction...

Profiteering - DTH services - Entertainment Tax was neither allowed as ITC in pre GST era nor has been allowed in the GST era and same was borne by the Respondent hence...

The respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on the benefit of GST rate reduction on cinema tickets, realizing an additional Rs. 4,65,549 from recipients. As...

Profiteering - supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films - benefit of reduction in the GST rate not passed on - the Respondent is...

Profiteering - sale of a built up house - DGAP's Report revealed that the ratio of ITC to the taxable turnover post GST period increase from 0.61% to 3.45% i.e net...

Levy of penalty - Profiteering - purchase of flat - It is apparent from the perusal of Section 122 (1) (i) that the violation of the provisions of Section 171 (1) is not...

Profiteering - Respondent had increased the price of the flat after the introduction of GST - benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) not passed on - the Respondent has...

Profiteering - purchase of Stayfree Sanitary Napkins - allegation is that reduction in the rate of Input Tax Credit has not been passed y commensurate reduction of the...

Quick Updates: