Validity of scrutiny assessment - Non-service of the notice on ...

Scrutiny Assessment Challenged: Notice Improperly Served, Violating Order-5, Rule-17 and Rule-20 of Civil Procedure Code.

October 11, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of scrutiny assessment - Non-service of the notice on the assessee - notice served through affixture - Assessing Officer failed to serve the notice to the assessee at his last known address and therefore not in confirmatory with the provisions of the Order-5, Rule -17 & Rule-20 of the C.P.C .

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of scrutiny assessment - Non-service of the notice on ...

Scrutiny Assessment Challenged: Notice Improperly Served, Violating Order-5, Rule-17 and Rule-20 of Civil Procedure Code.

October 11, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

Validity of assessment - Once the notice u/s 143(2) was not served on the assessee through proper channel, even though such notice has been served through a person, who...

Validity of notice u/s 143(2) - scrutiny assessment - issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) by correct AO - As per CBDT instruction the scrutiny noticemust be issued by the...

Conversion of “Limited Scrutiny” into “Complete Scrutiny” - Expanding the scope of limited scrutiny assessment without necessary approval - Since the notice under...

Demand of additional tax on simple processing of income - Applicability of provision of Section 143(1A) where assessment may have been completed u/s 143(3) - The High...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - second re-assessment notice u/s 148A - The High Court noted that the petitioner did not challenge the earlier re-assessment order dated...

Validity of assessment - notice of hearing was served upon minor daughter - the notice should be served at least on any adult member of the family and if the notice is...

Non-service of mandatory notice u/s 143(2) renders assessment proceedings void ab initio. Revenue failed to prove sending of notice by ordinary post/registered post or...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Manner of service of notice - there is no mentioning of reasons by the A.O. in the assessment order as to why the Notice has to be served through...

Validity of SCN - delivery of notices beyond the time limitation - the notice was served on them by hand on 03.04.2001. In such circumstances, the service of notice...

Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of notice - There was no valid service of notice u/s 148 of the Act in the present case. The finding of the...

The final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 read with Section 144C(13) for the Assessment Year 2016-17 is quashed as barred by limitation. Except...

Validity of the issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) - Scope of proper service of notice - notice u/s. 143(2) served through affixture - Since in the instant case, the notice...

Validity of Reopening of assessment - Since there was a scope of AO for the scrutiny assessment at the time of scrutiny assessment, which is still in the grey area as to...

HC upheld the assessment order made under section 143(3) read with section 144B. The assessee's contention regarding violation of Faceless Assessment Scheme due to...

Quick Updates: