Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - suppression of turnover - ...

Penalty Imposed for Turnover Suppression u/s 271(1)(c); Minimum Rate Set at 100% of Evaded Tax Confirmed.

April 10, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - suppression of turnover - penalty imposed at the minimum amount of 100% of the tax sought to be evaded - The penalty imposed for both the years is at the minimum rate, confirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - suppression of turnover - ...

Penalty Imposed for Turnover Suppression u/s 271(1)(c); Minimum Rate Set at 100% of Evaded Tax Confirmed.

April 10, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of depreciation @100% instead of 15% - Temporary Wooden structures like interiors, glow signs etc. being Furniture & Fixture - Levy of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - furnished wrong particulars of its income in terms of profits u/s 115JB - Computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - this is not a fit case for levy of 300% penalty. Therefore, we direct the assessing officer to levy minimum penalty i.e. 100% of the...

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

Penalty u/s 271 AAB or u/s 271 (1)(c) - concealment on income - as per clause (2) of section 271AAB, no penalty under the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Quick Updates: