Jurisdiction of AO for service of notice u/s 143(2) - Difference ...

Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer Under Scrutiny: Discrepancies in PAN and ITR Addresses Affect Notice Validity u/s 143(2.

September 28, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Jurisdiction of AO for service of notice u/s 143(2) - Difference in address as per PAN records and Income Tax Return (ITR) - even if presumed to be by jurisdictional Assessing Officer has not been served properly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction of AO for service of notice u/s 143(2) - Difference ...

Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer Under Scrutiny: Discrepancies in PAN and ITR Addresses Affect Notice Validity u/s 143(2.

September 28, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

Compulsory scrutiny - AO Jurisdiction and authority to take up the case for compulsory scrutiny - Since the conditions as prescribed in Clause D of para 3 of the...

Complete Scrutiny v/s Limited scrutiny - In the assessee`s case under consideration the issue of mismatch of sales shown in the audit report vis-à-vis ITR was for...

Determining the jurisdiction of appellate forum - jurisdiction of this Tribunal - The Tribunal refers to the legal precedent established in a Supreme Court case...

Conversion of limited scrutiny into complete scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) - where the Assessing officer has taken up fresh issue without converting limited scrutiny to...

Validity of notice - Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In the present case, there is an in advertent error in the notice issued by the AO reflecting only the PAN column...

Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer u/s 120 - Transfer of case u/s 124 - Assessee had a legitimate expectation from the DCIT, Circle-3, Gurgaon, that the objection raised...

The High Court held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 was not valid where the Assessing Officer had previously examined the claim for deduction of foreign exchange...

Territorial Jurisdiction - proper officer or not - Registration was assigned to Central GST Officer - SCN was issued by the State GST officer - the distribution of work...

Scope of limited scrutiny - mandation of recording satisfaction before extending/expanding scope of scrutiny - the Assessment framed by the Assessing Officer on the...

The High Court quashed the reopening notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 for reassessment beyond the period of four years. The assessee had filed returns...

Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of notice - There was no valid service of notice u/s 148 of the Act in the present case. The finding of the...

The ITAT Delhi held that the notice issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s 148 was invalid. The jurisdiction over the assessee was with a different...

Jurisdiction of AO - The PAN follows the jurisdiction. It is not the jurisdiction that follows the PAN. The effective date of transfer of jurisdiction is the date of...

Quick Updates: