Passing such contrary orders, only seems to suggest that the ...

Revenue's Contradictory Orders in Adjudication Undermine Process, Forcing Appeals Despite Business-Friendly Claims.

October 3, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax HC

Passing such contrary orders, only seems to suggest that the entire adjudication proceedings are a mere farce. The attitude of the Revenue even at the level of the Commissioner is that the demand has to be confirmed and the relief if any, the party has to obtain from Appellate Authorities. This attitude brings to a naught to claim of the State that it is business friendly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Passing such contrary orders, only seems to suggest that the ...

Revenue's Contradictory Orders in Adjudication Undermine Process, Forcing Appeals Despite Business-Friendly Claims.

October 3, 2019

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

Rejection of appeal as not maintainable - Appeal-able order - Filing of appeal before the Adjudication order - The expression 'order' used in sub-section (3) can in...

CBDT clarifies that orders under section 201 of Income Tax Act are not exempt from e-Appeals Scheme 2023, even when made pursuant to section 133A actions. These orders...

The central issue revolves around the maintainability of a single appeal filed by the Revenue against multiple Bills of Entry. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure...

CESTAT upheld Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to remand case back to Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication. The original order was challenged for violating...

Authorization by committee of commissioner - appeal before tribunal - The intent and spirit of the law is that the committee has to thread bare examine the issues/points...

Maintainability of appeal against order under CGST/SGST Act adjudication on refund application dismissed. Appellant had option to pay amounts demanded or contest seizure...

One appeal filed by the Revenue against 7 Bills of Entry is not maintainable. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, when the Commissioner (Appeals)...

Rule 6(A) requires filing separate appeals for each order-in-original. In a case involving multiple Bills of Entry, if a common order-in-appeal disposed of appeals...

CIT(A) allowed assessee to withdraw appeal against section 263 revision order, stating Tribunal quashed section 263 order and CIT(A) erred in not deciding appeal merits....

Challenge to non-speaking order of assessment and consequential rectification order. Order passed without considering objections, violating principles of natural justice....

Decisions taken by the Board of Approval (BoA) for Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in its 119th meeting. Some notable points: - BoA approved conversion of processing areas...

ITAT ruled that the PCIT's revision order under Section 263 was unsustainable. The Tribunal found no incriminating material in the seized documents to support claims of...

HC determined that Revenue's contradictory stance regarding BCCI's registration status was legally untenable. While Revenue argued the communication dated 28 December...

The petitioner sought direction for acceptance of appeals u/s 18.06.2021. HC held non-production of hard copy of impugned order is a technical defect. Citing PKV...

Right of department to file any appeal or cross-objections before the Commissioner (Appeals) against Refund order - the Department could neither have filed an appeal...

Quick Updates: