Levy of penalty on Customs Broker u/s 114 and 114AA of the ...

Customs broker cleared of penalties u/ss 114 and 114AA for alleged false drawback claims due to reasonable explanation.

September 9, 2020

Case Laws Customs AT

Levy of penalty on Customs Broker u/s 114 and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation that appellant had helped in claiming false drawback by misdeclaration - - appellant have not done any act or omission nor knowingly used any document for the clearance knowing to be false. The appellant have given cogent explanation as regards the undervaluation, that the samples shown to them were of good quality and hence on such reasonable belief they have undertaken the clearance work. - Penalty deleted - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty on Customs Broker u/s 114 and 114AA of the ...

Customs broker cleared of penalties u/ss 114 and 114AA for alleged false drawback claims due to reasonable explanation.

September 9, 2020

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The appellants, who were neither exporters nor Customs House Agents (CHAs), were wrongly penalized u/ss 114 and 114AA for overvaluation of goods for claiming excess duty...

The penalty imposed u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant (a Customs Broker) for abetting the clearance of undeclared/mis-declared export goods was...

Levy of penalty on the appellants u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Customs Broker firm - A Custom Broker is supposed to safeguard the interests of both exporters and...

Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA respectively of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abatement - fraudulent export to claim duty drawback - The...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - To constitute a criminal offence of abetment as punishable as defined under Section 107 of...

Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - All the allegations if any, would fall under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations. No...

CESTAT overturned penalties imposed under Customs Act sections 114(i), 114(iii), and 114AA against appellant CHA regarding alleged duty drawback fraud through overvalued...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - Personal penalty on General Manger of the Customs Broker - not verifying genuineness of the exporter and his...

CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114 Customs Act was not imposed on Respondents for smuggling undeclared cigarettes concealed with gypsum plaster. Penalty was...

Rejection of declared F.O.B. value and imposition of penalty u/ss 114(iii) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 upheld. Market enquiry conducted in presence of appellant's...

Customs broker misclassified goods (safety matches) to obtain higher MEIS benefit for exporter. Charges were levied u/s 114(iii) of Customs Act, 1962. Key points:...

Customs broker firm handled eight shipping bills involving overvaluation of export goods. Exporter prepared eight separate invoices, directing broker to file accordingly....

The public notice streamlines the procedure for processing brand rate drawback claims u/s 75 of the Customs Act, 1962 for Bengaluru City Customs. It outlines...

Levy of penalty on Customs Broker under Section 132 read with Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 - a Customs House Agent or a Customs Broker cannot be fastened with...

Quick Updates: