Levy of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - The failure of the ...

Penalty Invalid if Assessing Officer Fails to Record Satisfaction u/s 271(1)(c); Not Correctable by Section 292B.

February 9, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Levy of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - The failure of the Assessing Officer to record such satisfaction makes the order levying penalty invalid and bad in law and such mistake is not curable defect under section 292B of the Act as it goes to the jurisdiction of levy of penalty for concealment. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - The failure of the ...

Penalty Invalid if Assessing Officer Fails to Record Satisfaction u/s 271(1)(c); Not Correctable by Section 292B.

February 9, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. It was questioned whether a precise charge was brought against the assessee and if the...

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

AO having failed to record his satisfaction while initiating proceedings for imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) as to which limb of the provisions of section 271(1)(c)...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - a case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income has not been made out against the assessee. - Though, similar disallowances were made by...

Quick Updates: