CIRP - The onus to prove the existence of fraud is on the party ...

Insolvency and Bankruptcy

July 22, 2022

CIRP - The onus to prove the existence of fraud is on the party alleging the same and in the present case, the applicant had miserably failed to establish the same - there is no injunction against the Lenders from exercising their contractual rights or statutory rights. Further, the banks are exercising their statutory rights in accordance with law as they are not party to the arbitration proceedings. Moreover, the Applicant is not even a stakeholder in respect of the Corporate Debtor and, a complete third-party to the proceedings before this Tribunal and has no locus standi to question initiation of proceedings under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against the Corporate Debtor. - Tri

View Source

← Previous Next →

CIRP - The onus to prove the existence of fraud is on the party ...

Insolvency and Bankruptcy

July 22, 2022

You may also like:

Validity of order of CIRP obtained - allegation of fraud on the part of Financial Creditor (FC) - The entire transaction as narrated in the Section 7 application is...

Delay in implementation of approved Resolution Plan - In the present case, the Approved Resolution Plan has been alleged to be contravened by the Successful Resolution...

Dishonor of Cheque - legally enforceable debt or not - Since the accused rebutted the presumption whatever arisen by adducing oral and documentary evidence, the onus...

Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained share application money - onus to prove - Where the assessee shows that entries regarding cash credit in a third party’s account are...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - It is not a case that the assessee had filed merely a confirmatory letters of share applicants but it is a case...

CENVAT Credit - duty paying documents - The party against whom the allegation of fraud is made has to be put on notice and heard. Evidence must be led wherefrom a...

Import of goods - infringement of the Intellectual Property Rights of the plaintiffs - eeking impleadment in the present suit as a proper party - Infringement of trade...

Valuation of imported goods - allegation of over-valuation of the goods - It is true that fraud would vitiate everything, but then fraud has not only to be alleged but...

CIRP proceedings and approval of resolution plan - judgement has been obtained by playing fraud with the Court or not - The applicant in the present application has...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the...

Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share applicants - Both the nature & source of the share application received was...

CIRP - discrimination of Related Party Financial or Operational Creditor - IBC treats related parties as a separate category for specified purposes, excluding from the...

Additions u/s 68 - income from un-disclosed sources - Agriculture Income or not - exemption of income u/s 10(1) read with Section 2(1A) denied - onus to prove - The...

Initiation of CIRP - existence of debt of dispute or not - There is no claim regarding the principal amount and the issue of contention is demurrage and detention...

Remittance from outside India - revenue v/s capital receipt - onus to prove - assessee could not discharge his onus and could not prove that the money has come out of...

Quick Updates: