Levy of penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise ...

Central Excise

July 23, 2022

Levy of penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit - There are no whisper about any retraction or any disputes as to their statements being not voluntary. The same are not even rebutted as having been obtained per force. Hence, the statements are relevant documents. The present appeal was filed in the year 2013 and the appellant had sufficient time to place all such relevant documents on record, but no such attempt is made. - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise ...

Central Excise

July 23, 2022

You may also like:

Levy of penalty in the absence of confiscation - penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 even in case where there is no proposal for confiscation can be...

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus Cenvatable invoices issued - the appellant was liable to pay penalty - AT

Imposition of penalty u/r 26(2) of CER, 2002 - CENVAT Credit - Wrong availment of credit and reversal thereof on being pointed out before the issue of SCN - maximum...

Levy of penalty Rule 26 of Central Excise Act, 2002 - charge of abatement in the offence of fraudulent availment of cenvat credit - All the appellant having direct and...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

Levy of penalty - During the impugned period i.e January 2003 to January 2005, there was no provision to impose penalty for issuance of invoices without supplying the...

Quick Updates: