Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non-consideration of reply filed by the ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Quashed: Assessing Officer Violated Natural Justice Principles, Ignored Assessee's Reply.

September 2, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non-consideration of reply filed by the assessee - the order levying penalty suffers from violation of principle of natural justice and non-application of mind by the AO and the same cannot be allowed to stand. The AO has not exercised his power to levy penalty in a fair, reasonable and judicial manner - Penalty order quashed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non-consideration of reply filed by the ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Quashed: Assessing Officer Violated Natural Justice Principles, Ignored Assessee's Reply.

September 2, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - a case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income has not been made out against the assessee. - Though, similar disallowances were made by...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed in violation of principles of natural justice by not granting reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. The ITAT passed orders on 09.01....

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

Principles of natural justice violated - no opportunity of hearing provided, order passed without assigning reasons for cancellation of registration. Cancellation order...

The High Court held that the faceless assessment order was invalid as it violated the principles of natural justice and the provisions of Section 144B of the Income Tax...

Quick Updates: