Refund claim - the intimation u/s 143(1)(a) cannot be treated to ...

Revised Tax Return for 2005-06 Deemed Valid; Section 143(1)(a) Intimation Not an Assessment Order.

January 21, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Refund claim - the intimation u/s 143(1)(a) cannot be treated to be an order of assessment - for A.Y. 2005- 06 revised return filed on 26.9.2006 was thus validly filed within limitation. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - the intimation u/s 143(1)(a) cannot be treated to ...

Revised Tax Return for 2005-06 Deemed Valid; Section 143(1)(a) Intimation Not an Assessment Order.

January 21, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity of revised return u/s 139(5) - return was revised after issuance of intimation u/s 143(1) - claim of benefit of excess set off of losses and carry forward of...

The assessment u/s 143(1) was invalid as the procedure laid down u/s 144B was not followed. The case was selected for regular assessment, but the assessee was not given...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the issue of merger of intimation u/s 143(1) and scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The case...

Validity of adjustments made in an intimation u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, where there was a mismatch between the income tax return and the tax audit report filed...

Notices issued u/ss 84 and 27(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were valid. The time limitation for revising assessment orders is not an issue if a...

The petitioner's transaction of sale of immovable property was complete in the assessment year (AY) 2005-06 through execution of agreement, receipt of consideration, and...

Validity of revised return 139(5) - Revised return did not conform to the prescription of section 139(5), before its substitution w.e.f. A.Y. 2017-18, which provided for...

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

Validity of manual revised returns filed - scheme of demerger approved - scheme of arrangement approved by NCLT required Petitioner and Hind Lamps to file revised...

The preliminary assessment u/s 143(1) is limited to processing the return for arithmetical errors, incorrect expense claims, verifying audit reports, deductions, and...

The ITAT Delhi held that the merger of intimation/proceedings u/s 143(1) with regular assessment u/s 143(3) results in the intimation losing relevance once regular...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 against intimation u/s. 143(1) - Rejection on the ground that, revised return was not authenticated - The ITAT recognize the mistake in...

Rejection of rectification petition - turnover of the petitioner was erroneously reported in the GSTR 1 return - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's claim...

Non-payment of tax for Assessment Years 2005-06 and 2006-07 - Liability to pay interest u/s 234B. Prior to the insertion of proviso to Section 209(1), if the payer...

Quick Updates: