Condonation of delay of a period of 3 and ½ years in filing ...

Court Allows Petition Despite 3.5-Year Delay; Appellant Must Pay 20% Disputed Tax Within Six Weeks.

November 15, 2022

Case Laws GST HC

Condonation of delay of a period of 3 and ½ years in filing present petition - appellant contend that the limitation would start to run only after a notification is issued constituting the Tribunal - The writ petition is restored to the file of this Court with a direction to the appellant to pay 20% of the balance disputed tax within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the server copy of this judgment - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Condonation of delay of a period of 3 and ½ years in filing ...

Court Allows Petition Despite 3.5-Year Delay; Appellant Must Pay 20% Disputed Tax Within Six Weeks.

November 15, 2022

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

HC granted interim stay on appellate order demanding GST dues for two weeks, conditional upon petitioner paying 10% of disputed tax balance beyond Section 107(6)...

The High Court reviewed a challenge to an interim order requiring appellants to deposit 20% of the remaining unpaid interest within a specified timeframe. The court held...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

HC set aside the impugned assessment order due to improper service of show cause notices through GST portal instead of tender or RPAD, violating natural justice...

Tax authority rejected rectification application filed by taxpayer for zero-rated supply citing violation of principles of natural justice. Court examined impugned...

The ITAT Chennai held that the denial of registration u/s 80G(5) to an old trust was unjustified as the trust existed before the new registration regime. The trust...

HC granted interim stay on appellate GST demand order for two weeks, considering absence of constituted Appellate Tribunal and prima facie case established by petitioner....

Stay of demand - pre-deposit of only 20% of the disputed demand - adjustments of refunds against demand - respondent is entitled to seek pre-deposit of only 20% of the...

CENVAT credit - Rule 6 - Even if sub-rule (3) prescribes a limit of 20% for availment of service tax credit, sub-rule (5) provides for whole of the service tax credit in...

Scope and validity of policy circular - EPCG Authorisation - The impugned policy circular dated 29.03.2019 is therefore, beyond the jurisdiction of respondent no. 3 as...

The High Court reviewed a challenge to an assessment order, focusing on the violation of natural justice principles and the issue of input tax credit entitlement due to...

Sub-section (5) and sub-section (6) inserted in section 16 of CGST Act retrospectively extend the time limit to avail input tax credit in certain specified cases...

Stay - Waiver of pre-deposit - power of Appellate Authority to insist on the assessee paying more than 20% of the disputed tax - Unless the assessee remits 20% of the...

HC set aside the order requiring mandatory 20% deposit of disputed tax demand as precondition for stay application hearing. The court found this requirement violated...

The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

Quick Updates: