Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2024 Year 2024 This

Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B ...


Court Quashes Tax Assessment Orders Over GSTR Mismatch, Requires Partial Payment for Reconsideration.

March 20, 2024

Case Laws     GST     HC

Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the existence of difficulties arising from the mismatch between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A returns, as evidenced by the issuance of Circular No.183. Despite the petitioner's non-participation in the assessment proceedings, the court considered the certificate from the Chartered Accountant provided by the petitioner and deemed it sufficient justification for interference with the impugned orders. - The court quashed the assessment orders and remanded the matters for reconsideration with the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand for each assessment period within 15 days.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Challenge to assessment order and rectification order for assessment year 2018-19 - mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-2B - order challenged on grounds of...

  2. For payment of tax, no assessment order is required and only in case of short payment of tax assessment is required after due notice - but for the deferral in payment of...

  3. Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of...

  4. Eligibility for Input Tax Credit - Failure to report outward supply - The objection of the petitioner is that most of these items do not fall within the reverse charge...

  5. Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

  6. HC set aside the impugned order regarding time limitation and GSTR-3B/GSTR-2A mismatch dispute. The petitioner's willingness to deposit 25% of disputed tax amount was...

  7. Petitioner challenged order u/s 74 of TNGST Act, 2017 for assessment year 2017-18 due to mismatch between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A regarding input tax credit....

  8. Liability of tax arising on account of inadvertent error - mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns The High Court noted the certificates from...

  9. Validity of fresh assessment orders - HC quashed the assessment order invoking the writ jurisdiction - othing has been observed by the High Court on the merits of the...

  10. Mismatch in ITC Reporting - Non-payment of Tax on Director's Remuneration - The High Court found that the order failed to consider crucial submissions made by the...

  11. The court held that the petitioner was denied the principles of natural justice by not being given a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits regarding...

  12. The High Court found the order passed by the authority to be violative of principles of natural justice as it was a non-speaking order that failed to address the...

  13. The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to violation of principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to...

  14. Obligation to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C (1) - Petitioner asserts that even in partial remand proceedings from the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) is...

  15. The High Court held that the faceless assessment order was invalid as it violated the principles of natural justice and the provisions of Section 144B of the Income Tax...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates