Provisional attachment order u/s 83 of CGST Act challenged for ...

Provisional attachment order challenged for exceeding 1-year limit. Court upheld mandatory time limit, quashing order dated 19.05.2023.

July 12, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Provisional attachment order u/s 83 of CGST Act challenged for completion of one year's period. Court held that Section 83 employs mandatory language, and impugned provisional attachment order dated 19.05.2023 ceased to have effect upon expiry of one year period from issuance date, i.e., 19.05.2023. Petition disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Provisional attachment order u/s 83 of CGST Act challenged for ...

Provisional attachment order challenged for exceeding 1-year limit. Court upheld mandatory time limit, quashing order dated 19.05.2023.

July 12, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

GST is payable under reverse charge mechanism on issuance of corporate guarantee without consideration by foreign group company to Indian subsidiary for loan taken from...

The assessee's request for fixation of special rate of brand-rate drawback was rejected due to non-fulfilment of basic requirements and time limitation. The assessee...

Notification 38/2024 Customs extends the duration for export of aircraft and vessels imported for maintenance, repair and overhauling from 6 months to 1 year, further...

HC held that assessment orders for tax years 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 were time-barred under Rule 14A (5A), which mandates assessments must be completed within four years...

Assessee company failed to deduct tax at source as reflected in Tax Auditor's report. Demand u/s 201(1)/201(14) was barred by limitation. Assessee submitted that...

GST Revenue collection in the month of April 2018 exceeds ₹ 1 Lakh Crore

Disallowance of setting off of the carried forward loss - return filed beyond the due date specified under subsection (1) of section 139 - It was argued that the delay...

Amendment of section 44AD. - computing profits and gains of business on presumptive basis - where an assessee declares profit for any previous year in accordance with...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

The High Court dismissed the writ petition. The petitioner, being a registered person not liable for registration before the appointed day of 01.07.2017, sought...

HC held that the notice u/s 148 was time-barred under Section 149(1), rendering it invalid. The Assessing Officer (AO) exceeded statutory limitations by issuing a notice...

Nature of expenditure - revenue or capital expenditure - One-time lease rental charges paid to Greater Noida Industrial Development Authorities (GNIDA) for a period of...

HC found the refund claim for unutilized input tax credit time-barred u/s 54. The court interpreted Section 54(1) and 54(3) to establish that while refund claims can be...

Deduction us.37(1) on account of “Escrow Disbursement Provision” ('EDP’) - Prior period expenditure - To put it simply, the AO will bifurcate total Escrow Disbursement...

Time limit for issue of Notice - Customs Broker - "Issue of Notice" versus "Service of Notice" - The word ‘issue’ in regulation 17 of the 2018 Regulations or regulation...

Quick Updates: