ITAT adjudicated a case involving penalty under section 271D for ...

Taxpayer Wins Challenge Against Cash Transaction Penalty, Tribunal Finds No Statutory Violation in Property Sale

May 21, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT adjudicated a case involving penalty under section 271D for alleged violation of section 269SS. The tribunal determined that the assessee's receipt of cash for immovable property sale, executed before a government registration authority, did not constitute a statutory breach. The tribunal exercised judicial discretion, recognizing the assessee's bonafide belief regarding the applicability of statutory provisions. Considering the technical nature of the alleged violation and following precedential reasoning, the tribunal deleted the penalty imposed under section 271D, emphasizing that statutory obligations must be interpreted with contextual understanding and reasonable interpretation.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT adjudicated a case involving penalty under section 271D for ...

Taxpayer Wins Challenge Against Cash Transaction Penalty, Tribunal Finds No Statutory Violation in Property Sale

May 21, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the penalty under Section 271D for accepting cash loans/deposits in violation of Section 269SS. The tribunal found no substantive...

ITAT allowed taxpayer's appeal, finding cash payments for land purchase were genuine business transactions. The tribunal determined payments were made out of commercial...

ITAT adjudicated a dispute involving inter-company transactions and potential tax violations. The tribunal examined transactions between an assessee company and its...

Penalty levied u/s 271D for contravention of Section 269SS, which restricts cash transactions above a specified sum for immovable property. The key points are: The...

The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under s.271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation cannot be levied against the German resident...

Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, ruled on unexplained cash deposits in bank accounts opened by a CA misusing KYC documents. The CA, acting fraudulently, used the...

The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalty was initiated u/s. 271DA instead of u/s. 271D, which led to confusion and violated the assessee's right to a fair hearing....

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus Long Term Capital Gains due to off-market cash purchase of shares. The taxpayer's claim for deduction...

Addition u/s 69A - Addition of cash deposits made by the assessee during the demonetization period - The Tribunal examined the legality of the assessment order, the...

Revision u/s 263 challenged for lack of proper inquiry by Assessing Officer regarding cash deposits during demonetization, scrap sales, and non-submission of audit...

The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - onus to prove source of cash - The Tribunal found that the assessee's business model of currency exchange was genuine, supported by...

The ITAT ruled that penalties under sections 271(1)(c) and 270A against the taxpayer were improper and directed their deletion. The tribunal held that merely making an...

ITAT set aside penalty under s271DA for cash receipts exceeding Rs. 2 lakhs, finding reasonable cause in taxpayer's interpretation of s269ST's "single transaction"...

Quick Updates: