Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2025 Year 2025 This

CESTAT allowed appellants' appeals, setting aside customs duty ...


Customs Duty Appeal Succeeds: Electronic Evidence Invalidated, Appellants Exonerated with Full Refund Under Sections 138B and 138C

May 24, 2025

Case Laws     Customs     AT

CESTAT allowed appellants' appeals, setting aside customs duty demand and penalty. The tribunal found no sustainable evidence of undervaluation, non-compliance with notification requirements, or procedural irregularities. Electronic evidence and investigation statements were deemed inadmissible due to non-compliance with Sections 138B and 138C of Customs Act. The tribunal ordered refund of Rs. 1,21,73,905/- paid during investigation within 60 days, effectively exonerating the appellants of all charges related to customs duty evasion and undervaluation.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CESTAT ruled that secondary electronic evidence (Excel sheet printout from pen drive) was inadmissible without statutory certificate under section 138C of Customs Act....

  2. CESTAT adjudicated a customs penalty dispute, finding insufficient evidence to substantiate allegations against the appellant. The tribunal determined that the appellant...

  3. Electronic evidences - Section 138C of Customs Act, 1962 - it is found that the entire case proceeded on the basis of the electronic documents as evidence. But the...

  4. Appellant, a Customs House Agent (CHA), was exonerated from penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act. CESTAT held no evidence of appellant's abetment in misdeclaration of...

  5. Seizure of gold and a vehicle by police authorities from the appellant and others. The police handed over the seized goods to customs authorities. The appellant is the...

  6. CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the Customs Broker License. The tribunal found no substantive evidence of fraud or regulatory violations by...

  7. Electronic Sealing-Deposit in and removal of goods from Customs Bonded Warehouses - Circular

  8. Electronic Sealing - deposit in and removal of goods from Customs Bonded warehouses - Trade Notice

  9. Electronic sealing - Deposit in and removal of goods from Customs bonded Warehouses.

  10. Electronic sealing — Deposit in and removal of goods from Customs bonded Warehouses

  11. Implementing Electronic Sealing for Containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure - Customs

  12. CESTAT appellate proceedings concerning attempted export of prohibited peacock feathers involved allegations against an appellant for misrepresenting goods as 'carpets'....

  13. Misdeclaration of goods regarding value and quantity - goods declared as 'unbranded', but branded caps of various brands like Puma, Nike, Adidas etc. found -...

  14. CESTAT adjudicated a case involving clandestine manufacture and removal of goods, finding critical evidentiary deficiencies. The tribunal invalidated electronic evidence...

  15. Initiation of CIRP - Whether the WhatsApp conversation between the Parties can be admitted as evidence? - The proof of service through electronic mode would not form...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates