Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (2) TMI 436 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......g the refund claim. The ld. Commissioner (A) has not even dealt with this aspect. The Revenue rsquo s contention that duty was not paid under protest as the procedure prescribed under Rule 233B was not followed by the respondent has merit. We accept the same. 5. emsp Revenue rsquo s appeal is allowed. The order of the Commissioner (A) is set aside.
|