Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (8) TMI 443 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......nd not place of removal. Clearly, Revenue is in error in invoking valuation under 4A in regard to goods removed from the factory prior to the items getting specified under Section 4A. Accordingly, impugned order is set aside and the appeals are allowed with consequential relief, if any, to the appellant. (Dictated and pronounced in the Open Court.)
|