Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (8) TMI 445 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......er. The Commissioner (Appeals) was competent to allow the adjustment to them. The differential amount after the adjustment, had already been deposited by the respondents. Therefore, the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) is valid and the same is upheld. The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. (Dictated and pronounced in open Court)
|