9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Validity of lease agreement under Wealth-tax Act, 1957; Application of section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
The judgment pertains to a case involving the validity of a lease agreement under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, for the assessment year 1975-76. The assessee had entered into an agreement for a 65-year lease of a property but had not executed a registered deed. The Wealth-tax Officer included the value of the lease in the assessee's assets, determining it at Rs. 2,72,727. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld this decision, considering the agreement enforceable in a court of law. However, the Tribunal disagreed, stating that without registration, the agreement could only be seen as a month-to-month tenancy, which could be terminated at any time. They directed the exclusion of the lease property's value for both years, emphasizing the absence of a valid lease agreement. The judgment further delves into the applicability of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, which deals with part performance of a contract for the transfer of immovable property. The provision protects the transferee's possession rights in cases where the contract is not registered. The Court observed that in this case, the assessee had taken possession of the property and derived income from it, raising the question of whether section 53A applied and if the property constituted an asset for the assessee. The Tribunal failed to consider this aspect, leading the Court to remand the matter for fresh consideration in light of section 53A. In conclusion, the Court disposed of the reference by remanding the case to the Tribunal for a reevaluation based on the facts and the provisions of section 53A. The judgment was a split decision, with both judges concurring.
|
