Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2015 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (8) TMI 1507 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
- Eligibility for deduction u/s.10A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Analysis:
The Appellate Tribunal, in this case, dealt with the issue of whether the assessee was eligible for a deduction under section 10A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Revenue had filed an appeal, contending that the CIT (A) had allowed the assessee's claim for deduction under section 10A. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had previously been granted a similar deduction in earlier assessment years based on the nature of services provided. The Department argued that the assessee, engaged in providing legal services, did not qualify for the deduction under section 10A. However, the Tribunal, after examining the orders and submissions, upheld the decision of the CIT (A) based on a previous ruling in the assessee's own case. The Tribunal cited that the services provided by the assessee, such as data processing for legal matters, fell within the definition of computer software and were eligible for the deduction under section 10A. The Tribunal found no reason to deviate from its earlier decision and dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, affirming the eligibility of the assessee for the deduction under section 10A.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment focused on the interpretation of the nature of services provided by the assessee in relation to the provisions of section 10A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal relied on its previous decision and held that the services rendered by the assessee, involving data processing for legal matters, qualified as computer software services eligible for the deduction under section 10A. The Tribunal emphasized consistency in its approach and declined to interfere with the CIT (A)'s order, ultimately dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates