Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases FEMA FEMA + AT FEMA - 1999 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1999 (5) TMI 638 - AT - FEMA

Issues:
1. Imposition of penalties under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.
2. Failure to initiate legal action against a defaulting foreign buyer.
3. Consideration of extension of time for realizing outstanding export proceeds.
4. Competence of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in decision-making for export-related matters.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The judgment involves penalties imposed on an appellant-company and its directors for contravention of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. The appellant-company was penalized for non-realization of export proceeds, while its directors faced penalties under a different section of the Act.

2. The issue of failure to initiate legal action against a defaulting foreign buyer was raised by the Adjudicating Officer. The appellants argued that not filing a suit in foreign courts did not equate to a lack of effective steps to recover outstanding export proceeds. Previous decisions of the Board were cited to support this argument.

3. The case also delved into the consideration of extension of time for realizing outstanding export amounts. The RBI was involved in this process, and the appellant had applied for both extension of time and permission to write off the outstanding amount. The judgment highlighted the importance of RBI's decision-making authority in such matters.

4. The competence of the RBI in decision-making for export-related issues was a crucial aspect of the judgment. It was emphasized that the RBI should independently assess each application for extension of time or write-off without being influenced by ongoing legal proceedings or investigations.

5. The judgment ultimately set aside the penalties imposed on the appellants, citing reasons such as the premature nature of the proceedings, pending RBI decisions on extension of time, and the need for independent RBI decision-making. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned for all appellants involved.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates