Encourage investment in residential property by offering tax exemption on capital gains in Clause 86 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section 54F of Income Tax Act, 1961 Clause 86 Capital gains on transfer of certain capital assets not to be charged in case of investment in residential house. - Income Tax Bill, 2025

Clause 86 Capital gains on transfer of certain capital assets not to be charged in case of investment in residential house. Income Tax Bill, 2025 Introduction Clause 86 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 , and Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , both address the non-chargeability of capital gains in scenarios where the proceeds from the sale of certain long-term capital assets are reinvested in residential property. This commentary seeks to provide a detailed analysis of these provisions, comparing the proposed changes in the 2025 Bill with the existing framework under the 1961 Act. Understanding these provisions is crucial for taxpayers, legal practitioners, and policymakers as they navigate the complexities of capital gains taxation and the incentives provided for reinvestment in residential property. Objective and Purpose The primary objective of both Clause 86 and Section 54F is to encourage investment in residential property by offering tax relief on capital gains. The legislative intent is to promote housing development and provide individuals and Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) with a financial incentive to reinvest proceeds from long-term capital assets into residential housing. This aligns with broader policy goals of increasing housing availability and stimulating the real estate sector, which is a significant contributor to the economy. Detailed Analysis of Clause 86 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Key Provisions 1. Eligibility and Conditions: - Clause 86 applies to individuals and HUFs with capital gains from transferring long-term capital assets, excluding residential houses. - The capital gains must be reinvested in purchasing or constructing a residential house in India within specified timeframes: one year before or two years after the transfer for purchase, and three years for construction. 2. Calculation of Exemption: - If the net consideration exceeds the cost of the new asset, a proportional amount of capital gains is exempt. - If the net consideration is equal to or less than the cost of the new asset, the entire capital gains are exempt. 3. Utilization and Deposit Requirements: - Unutilized capital gains must be deposited in a specified account if not used before filing the income return. - Deposits must comply with a scheme notified by the Central Government. 4. Restrictions and Conditions: - Exemption is not applicable if the taxpayer owns more than one residential house on the date of transfer, or purchases/constructs another house within specified periods. - If the new asset is transferred within three years, the exempted gains become chargeable. 5. Monetary Limits: - Exemptions are capped if the cost of the new asset or net consideration exceeds ten crore rupees. Comparison with Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Similarities - Both provisions target individuals and HUFs and require reinvestment in residential property within similar timeframes. - The calculation of exemption based on the proportion of reinvestment relative to net consideration is consistent across both provisions. - Both sections impose conditions on owning multiple residential properties and require deposits of unutilized gains. Differences 1. Monetary Caps and Adjustments: - Clause 86 introduces a cap of ten crore rupees on the cost of the new asset and net consideration, which is a more recent addition to Section 54F, reflecting changes in economic conditions and inflation adjustments. 2. Procedural Enhancements: - Clause 86 specifies more detailed procedural requirements for depositing unutilized gains, reflecting an emphasis on compliance and transparency. 3. Scope of Application: - The language in Clause 86 is more precise in defining the conditions under which the exemption applies, potentially reducing ambiguities present in the 1961 Act. Practical Implications For Taxpayers - Taxpayers stand to benefit from strategic reinvestment in residential properties, potentially leading to significant tax savings. - The introduction of monetary caps necessitates careful planning to maximize the benefits under these provisions. For Legal Practitioners and Advisors - Legal practitioners must navigate the nuances between the existing and proposed provisions to provide accurate advice. - Understanding the procedural requirements and compliance obligations is crucial for assisting clients in optimizing their tax positions. For Policymakers - Policymakers should consider the broader economic impact of these provisions on the housing market and tax revenue. - Continuous monitoring and adjustment of monetary caps and conditions may be necessary to align with economic changes and policy goals. Comparative Analysis with Other Jurisdictions - Similar provisions exist in various jurisdictions, offering tax relief for reinvestment in residential properties. - Unique features of the Indian context include the specific conditions on owning multiple properties and the detailed procedural requirements for depositing unutilized gains. Conclusion Clause 86 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, and Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961, play a vital role in shaping taxpayer behavior and promoting investment in residential properties. While the core principles remain consistent, the proposed changes in the 2025 Bill introduce refinements aimed at enhancing compliance and aligning the provisions with current economic realities. As these provisions evolve, stakeholders must remain informed and adaptable to maximize the benefits and ensure compliance with the law. Full Text : Clause 86 Capital gains on transfer of certain capital assets not to be charged in case of investment in residential house.