Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2004 (7) TMI 480

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... two appeals have been filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. KOL/CUS/211 & 212/PREV/03, dated 9-9-2003 passed by Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Kolkata. In brief, the facts of the case are as under :- "that the Inspector of Customs, booked seizure case No. l4/IMP/CL/CUS/SLG/DPU/2001, dated 15-2-2001 effecting seizure of 20,000 pcs. of black necklace (mala) of third country of origin valued at .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... consignment note no. 1091, dated 19-2-2001 and the carrier road challan no. 19/2000-2001, dated 19-2-2001 of M/s. Deepak Hardware Centre, but no follow-up officers of Naxalbari Preventive Unit reported that local businessmen of Sevoke Road, Siliguri, were contacted by them but no one could give the whereabouts of M/s. Deepak Hardware Centre, Sevoke Road, Siliguri." 2. Heard Shri K.P. Dey, le .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4. On the contrary, Shri T.K. Kar, learned SDR for the Revenue supports the Order of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals). In the present cases, the Revenue failed to establish that the goods were of third country origin. The initial burden lies upon the Revenue to prove the fact that the goods under seizure were imported from third country. The burden has not been, discharged by the Revenue .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , Collector's order endorsed by the Tribunal - Held : that once the Collector has concluded that there is no proof that the goods were smuggled goods, he has no jurisdiction to order confiscation of the goods since it was neither for the Collector nor for the Appellate Tribunal to go into the question of ownership of the goods - Goods ought to have been restored to the Railway Authorities to decid .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates