Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (10) TMI 874

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ry and incidental issues relating to rejection of books of account as well as violation of rules of natural justice. 3. Brief facts are, the assessee a domestic company is engaged in the business of purchase, construction, acquiring, running, etc., of all types of resorts, hotels, motels, holiday home, guest house, restaurants, Café, etc. For the assessment year under dispute, the assessee filed its return of income on 27th October 2007, declaring total income of Rs. 28,820. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee has entered into a MoU with Bhuminath Construction on 8th June 2006, for development of a-Class Hotel at Sanpada, Navi Mumbai. As per the terms of the agreement, Bhuminath Construct .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on is available. Thus, rejecting assessee's contention, the Assessing Officer proceeded to estimate the profit on the construction of the project at 8% of the cost incurred by the assessee on the project which worked out to Rs. 36 lakh. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer added back the amount to the income of the assessee. Being aggrieved of the addition made by the Assessing Officer, assessee preferred appeal before the first appellate authority. 4. Before the learned Commissioner (Appeals) the assessee objecting to the addition made by the Assessing Officer submitted that proper opportunity was not given to the assessee by the Assessing Officer. It was submitted, under the MoU, the contractor has a right to cancel the MoU if the develope .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o convert the project into a residence building in place of a hotel. He also observed that from the Balance Sheet, it was revealed that cost of construction of the project was partly made out by the assessee from borrowed funds of Rs. 94,94,882. He also observed, the assessee has paid interest of Rs. 9,60,000, which is more than the compensation received. Thus, on the aforesaid analysis of facts, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 5. Learned Authorised Representative submitted before us that cost of construction was also founded by Bhuminath Construction free of interest. He submitted, if the interest component on the amount advanced by Bhuminath Construction is considered, the compensatio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cts in the books of account and estimated income, books of account are impliedly rejected. He submitted, there is no specific clause in MoU providing the mode and manner of payment of compensation. Therefore, the basis for payment of compensation being not transparent, the claims of the assessee cannot be accepted. 7. We have heard rival contentions and perused the material available on record. It is evident, there is no dispute about the fact that the assessee and Bhuminath Construction have entered into MoU for development of a Hotel. It is also a fact that as per the terms of MoU, Bhuminath Construction will advance a sum of Rs. 5 crore in installments to the assessee for development of the project. It is also made clear in the MoU that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... basis of such half baked facts addition cannot be made on mere presumption and surmises. Therefore, we have no hesitation in deleting the addition made on estimate basis. However, the Assessing Officer is directed to bring to tax the compensation received by the assessee from Bhuminath Construction. Grounds no.1 and 2 are disposed off accordingly. 9. Ground no.3, relates to levy of interest under section 234B and 234C of the Act. 10. Both the parties admitted before us that this ground is consequential in nature. Accordingly, we direct the Assessing Officer to give consequential effect while re-computing the income of the assessee keeping in view our findings given above and in accordance with the provisions of law. 11. In the result, a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates