9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (9) TMI 1508X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... intendent (AR), for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The present appeal is arising out of Order-In-Appeal No. 368-ST/APPL/LKO/2017 dated 30/11/2017 passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Customs, CGST & Central Excise, Lucknow. 2. Heard the Learned Counsel for appellant. He has submitted that appellant were issued with a Show Cause Notice No.81/JC/LKO/ST/14-15 dated 20.10.2014 demanding s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l service tax of Rs. 16,072/- was sustained and equal penalty under said Section 78 was sustained and in rest of the order dated 29.03.2016 was set aside. Neither the appellant nor Revenue preferred any appeal against the said Order-In-Appeal dated 31.07.2017. He has further submitted that they received the impugned Order-In-Appeal bearing No. 368-ST/APPL/LKO/2017 dated 30.11.2017 and said order w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... assed in respect of same show cause notice bearing No. 81/JC/LKO/ST/14-15 dated 20.10.2014. 3. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of record, I find that it was a clerical mistake at some stage where same order has been assigned two numbers 199 and 202. The Order-In-Original assigned No. 199/ADC/ST/LKO/2015-16 dated 29.03.2016 was marked to the department and Order-In-Original assigned No ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
