2020 (11) TMI 986

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... complaint against the petitioner after completion of the investigation and absence of criminal antecedents; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Pradeep Kumar Bansal S/o Nagarmal Gupta shall be released on bail, subject to c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h Section(s) 132(1)(b)(i) 132(1)(C) of the Act of 2017. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that there has been violation of the mandatory provisions, while effecting arrest of the petitioner and its continuation as contained in the Act of 2017. Learned counsel contended that the petitioner is in custody since .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e petitioner, he does not deserve indulgence of bail. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned respective counsels, length of custody of the petitioner, the maximum punishment awardable under the Act of 2017 being five years, offences being compoundable, filing of the complaint against the petitioner after completion of the investigation and absence of criminal antecedents; .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X