2017 (8) TMI 1726

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Mr.K.Soundararajan For Respondent: Mr.K.Venkatesh Government Advocate ORDER Heard. Mr.K.Soundararajan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate (Tax) accepting notice on behalf of the respondent. With the consent on either side, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal. 2.The petitioner, who is a registered dealer on the file of the respondent .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... appeal was preferred in A.P.No.11 of 2016 before the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Thanjavur. The Appellate Authority by order dated 19.01.2017, allowed the appeal partly and remanded the matter on certain issues. There is no dispute as regards the action initiated by the respondent pursuant to such remand. 3.However, the petitioner is aggrieved by a proposal made in the notice dated 23.05 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... edly pointed out that if assessments are sought to be reopened based on the information culled out from the Official Website, the Assessing Officers cannot assess the dealer to tax without conducting an enquiry and in fact elaborate procedure has been suggested in the decision of this Court in JKM Graphics Solutions Private Limited Vs. CTO, Vepery Assessment Circle [99 VST 343]. However, the respo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X