1986 (6) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof the order of the High Court, dated 21-2-1980 and made herein, and the counter affidavits filed herein and the records of the respondents relating to the Order in 222/1979, dated 13-12-1979 and Order No. III/9/332/75-A1, dated 26-7-1975 on the file of the third and fourth respondent respectively comprised in the return of the respective respo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tory of the petitioner is within the jurisdiction of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, and hence this Court shall not show the indulgence of interference. The petitioner is a company having its head office in Madras. It is not claimed that the factory itself as an independent entity to suffer a separate assessment. This contention with regard to jurisdiction is not tenable. Hence this writ petitio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X