1983 (7) TMI 93

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... T (A). 2. The facts, in brief, are that the assessee had filed its return of income for asst. yr. 1968-69, which is under consideration, on 22nd August, 1970 declaring an income of Rs. 5,52,957 but no tax u/s 140A of the IT Act, 1961 was deposited. The assessee again revised its return of income reducing the same to Rs. 2,15,666 on which tax u/s 140A worked out to Rs. 1,07,800 but that too was n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t. 4. While disputing this action of the CIT (A) before us, the ld. counsel for the assessee Mr. D.K. Gupta drew our attention to a chart of income, income assessed by the ITO, CIT (A) and the Tribunal right from asst. yrs. 1964-65 to 1968-69 and submitted that in respect of the two issues i.e. gratuity and payment of interest of State Govt. And Northern Railways, dispute is still before the Hig .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er. 5. After taking into consideration the rival submissions and looking to the facts and perusing the explanation furnished by the assessee in the course of penalty proceedings, we find that the assessee had revised its return and mentioned that the same is subject to carry forward of earlier year's losses. Undoubtedly, due to certain disputes laid at rest only upto the Tribunal's stage, the as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X