Register Daily Newsletters My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

   For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp WhatsApp 9911796707
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes
TMI - e-Newsletter     TaxTMI    Anti-Dumping Duty Imposed on Textured Tempered...     TaxTMI    Govt Imposes Anti-Dumping Duty on Chinese Sodium...     TaxTMI    Govt Imposes Anti-Dumping Duty on Glufosinate...     TaxTMI    Tax Recovery Action Invalidated: Section 62(2)...     TaxTMI    Contractors Win GST Reimbursement Rights for...     TaxTMI    Tribunal Staff Rules Update: Enhanced Career...     TaxTMI    Development Rights Transfer Taxable Under GST: No...     TaxTMI    Tax Credit Dispute Resolved: Procedural Delays...     TaxTMI    Tax Authorities Update Income-tax Rules 1962,...     TaxTMI    Tax Authorities Instructed to Withdraw Appeals When...     TaxTMI    Electronic Filing Deemed Valid: Procedural...     TaxTMI    Tax Challenge Dismissed: Statutory Notice Upheld,...     TaxTMI    GST Levy on Leasehold Rights Transfer: Interim...     TaxTMI    Tax Credits Restored: Section 16 Amendments Allow...     TaxTMI    SEBI Mandates Investor Charter for KRAs to Boost...     TaxTMI    Latest Case-Laws     TaxTMI    Latest Notifications + Circulars     TaxTMI    GST Council Decisions     TaxTMI       Right Stop
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2013 Year 2013 This

There is no evidence on record to show that the cab was hired on ...


No Evidence of Cab Being Hired Regularly; No Demand or Penalty Imposed in the Case.

November 29, 2013

Case Laws     Service Tax     AT

There is no evidence on record to show that the cab was hired on monthly, weekly or daily basis. - No demand, no penalty - AT

View Source

 

← Previous Next →

 

You may also like:

  1. Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

  2. Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

  3. Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

  4. This case relates to the classification of services provided by the appellant, who hired out two 45-seater buses to ONGC for transportation purposes in Assam and parts...

  5. Appellant registered for providing cab operator's service rented vehicles to clients for transporting their employees, charges levied on kilometer basis inclusive of...

  6. Rent-a-cab operator service - providing vehicles to the clients on hire basis - There is the fundamental distinction between rent-a-cab and a pure case of hiring - the...

  7. Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

  8. CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114 Customs Act was not imposed on Respondents for smuggling undeclared cigarettes concealed with gypsum plaster. Penalty was...

  9. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  10. Once the main demand of duty case is settled under the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDRS) 2019, penalties imposed on co-noticees cannot be...

  11. 100% EOU - extended period of limitation - while demanding duty was not sure of the provision of law under which the same had to be demanded and even the penalty has...

  12. Imposition of penalty under Section 78 - Merely because penalty under Section 78 has been imposed for the earlier period, no penalty can be imposed for any subsequent...

  13. Since the penalties imposed under Section 76 is upheld, penalties imposed under Section 78 cannot be justified, Hence the penalties imposed u/s 78 is set aside - In the...

  14. CESTAT adjudicated a case involving alleged gold smuggling, finding insufficient evidence to substantiate charges against the appellant. The tribunal determined that the...

  15. Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
F: Tax Classification Showdown: Lower GST Rate Wins as Industry Challenge...
C: Government Imposes Anti-Dumping Duty on Chinese Titanium Dioxide Impor...
F: Late Fees and Interest Scrutiny: Section 73 Powers Examined for GST Fi...
A: Dishonored Cheque Case: Material Facts Suppression Leads to Complaint ...
A: Customs Rules Overhaul: Stricter Origin Verification Mandates Comprehe...
A: Trade Pacts Unlock Global Markets: India Strategically Balances Econom...
A: Fire Safety Audits Demand Urgent Reform: Comprehensive Inspections and...
A: Trade Tensions Escalate: US-China Economic Standoff Reshapes Global Su...
A: Navigating Global Seas: UNCLOS Defines Maritime Rights, Resolves Confl...
A: Protecting Undersea Internet Cables: Critical Global Infrastructure Ne...
A: Critical Global Networks at Risk: Undersea Internet Cables Navigate Co...
F: Promotional Dealer Incentives Deemed Taxable Supply Under GST Rules wi...
H: Challenging GST Assessment: Stone-Boulder Sales Price Comparison Inval...
H: Procedural Gaps in E-Way Bill Compliance Don't Automatically Justify G...
H: Taxpayer's ITC Credit Challenge Rejected as Administrative Mechanism P...
H: Procedural Fairness Prevails: Denial of Personal Hearing Invalidates A...
H: Procedural Lapses Invalidate Tax Appeal Order, Restore Petitioner's Ri...
H: Taxpayer Directed to Resolve GST Refund Technical Challenges Through D...
H: HC Upholds Natural Justice, Remands Case and Grants Petitioner Extensi...
H: Administrative Appeal Dismissed Without Notice Violates Natural Justic...
H: Alternative Remedy Available: Finance Act Section 85 Provides Legal Pa...
H: Petitioner Must First Exhaust Statutory GST Appeal Remedy Under Sectio...
H: Taxpayer Wins: Assessed Loss Carry Forward Upheld Despite Late Return ...
H: Faceless Assessment Violation: Draft Penalty Order Absent, Refund Adju...
H: Tax Reassessment Invalidated Due to Procedural Lapses in Notice Issuan...
H: Property Sales Tax Relief: Section 43CA Allows 10% Variance Between Sa...
H: Landmark Tax Decision: Assessee Wins Major Victory with Comprehensive ...
F: Navigating Delayed RCM Tax Liability for Commercial Property Rental: S...
F: Digital Content Creators Navigate Complex Tax Landscape with Income Ta...
T: Joint Maritime Tax Allocation: Precise Income Calculation for Shared S...