Whether the Tribunal is right in reversing in deleting the ...

Income Tax

July 3, 2014

Whether the Tribunal is right in reversing in deleting the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act solely on the ground that the High Court has admitted the appeal and, therefore, the issue can be stated to be debatable - Held no - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Whether the Tribunal is right in reversing in deleting the ...

Income Tax

July 3, 2014

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - While apparently surrendering all the income on its own by the Assessee ought not to have attracted penalty for concealment under Section...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective notice - The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the AO did not apply his mind...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - Since the Tribunal deleted the addition and ordered expunging the initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1C) no reason to...

Quashing of prosecution u/s 276C and 277 - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) deleted by CIT and confirmed by Tribunal - the prosecution cannot be sustained since the penalty after...

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of incorrect deduction u/s 80GGA - The Appellate Tribunal analyzed the timeline of events and noted that the assessee had...

Levy of penalty u/s 271AAA - concealed income on account of excess claim of depreciation - A.O has merely mentioned one line imported from section 271(1)(c) of the Act...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Tribunal proceeded on hyper- technicalities and acted as though every seizure must entail initiation of proceedings u/s 271 of the Act - no penalty - HC

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - defective notice - it would be too technical and pedantic to take the view that because in the printed notice the inapplicable portion...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - When the matter travelled to the Tribunal, the explanation which was given by the assessee and accepted by the CIT(A) was once again examined by...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - scope of Section 275(1A) - once substantial question of law against quantum additions are admitted by Hon’ble HC u/s 260A, the tribunal shall...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

Quick Updates: