Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2014 Year 2014 This

Seizure of goods - Discrepany in RG-1 Register - on an earlier ...


Penalty Confirmed for Repeated Discrepancies in RG-1 Register; Previous Excusal Not Considered Due to Recurrence.

September 20, 2014

Case Laws     Central Excise     HC

Seizure of goods - Discrepany in RG-1 Register - on an earlier occasion similar discrepancy of the goods not being accounted for in the R.G.-1 register had occurred and the appellant was let off in those cases, but the same mistake was being repeated again - levy of penalty confirmed - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Confiscation of goods - Excess stock found which was not recorded in RG-1 Register - search was conducted as on 10/3/2011 - RG-1 Register was updated only till 28/2/2011...

  2. Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

  3. Duty demand - Discrepancy in RG-1 Register - Shortage in goods - charges of clandestine activities are required to be upheld on the basis of sufficient cogent reasons...

  4. Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) or penalty u/s.271AAA - The provisions of Section 271AAA(3) of the Act specifically excludes the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the...

  5. Penalty u/s 11AC - Shortage of finished product vis-a-vis balance recorded in the RG-1 register – the appellant having sufficient balance in the RG-23A register, cannot...

  6. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  7. Confiscation of goods - Incomplete entry in RG-1 register - confiscation of the goods, redemption fine and imposition of penalty on the appellant company u/s 11AC upheld - AT

  8. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  9. Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

  10. Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

  11. Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

  12. Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

  13. Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

  14. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

  15. The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates