Confiscation of goods - Excess stock found which was not ...

Confiscated Stock Not Recorded in RG-1 Register; Appeal Fails to Prove No Intent to Evade Duty; Penalty Reduced.

October 26, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Confiscation of goods - Excess stock found which was not recorded in RG-1 Register - search was conducted as on 10/3/2011 - RG-1 Register was updated only till 28/2/2011 - Contention of the appellant that there is no intention to evade the payment of duty is not tenable - redemption fine and penalty confirmed but reduced - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Confiscation of goods - Excess stock found which was not ...

Confiscated Stock Not Recorded in RG-1 Register; Appeal Fails to Prove No Intent to Evade Duty; Penalty Reduced.

October 26, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

Penalty u/s 11AC - Shortage of finished product vis-a-vis balance recorded in the RG-1 register – the appellant having sufficient balance in the RG-23A register, cannot...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

The SC held that mere non-disclosure of receipts in service tax returns doesn't mean intent to evade tax payment. To invoke extended limitation period u/s 73(1) proviso...

Addition on account of excess stock - discrepancies in stock records, unaccounted sales - we are satisfied with the documentary evidence that the alleged stock of cotton...

Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

CESTAT adjudicated a customs dispute involving 37.34 kg of saffron, finding procedural irregularities in stock verification. The tribunal rejected confiscation based on...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Liability to pay fine and penalty - The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed the appeal, quashing the impugned order. The Court emphasized the necessity of proving mens...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Quick Updates: