Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2015 Year 2015 This

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - It is a misconception in the mind of ...

Income Tax

October 10, 2015

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - It is a misconception in the mind of assessee but he has not deliberately withheld something from the Assessing Officer. He has accounted these receipts in the next year and rather raised the dispute with regard to credit of the TDS - No penalty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

  2. Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

  3. AO rightly levied the penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) as the assessee has deliberately given inaccurate particulars of income.

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the Assessing Officer is not able to prove that the assessee was guilty of fraud or gross or willful negligence, penalty cannot be sustained - AT

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of law, is deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of penalty proceedings - HC

  6. Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - revised return filed - assessee has adopted the recourse of avoiding litigation, therefore, revised the return to buy peace of mind - no...

  7. Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - Suo-moto declaration of undisclosed assets located outside India under section 59 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessing Officer was quite unsure as to which of the two sections namely, section 271(1)(c) or section 271AAA was he intending to proceed. Such...

  9. Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates