Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2015 Year 2015 This

Clandestine removal of goods - pages / records seized during ...


Court Rules Clear Evidence Needed to Prove Alleged Removal of Goods in Case Involving M/s Arhat and M/s SUTPL.

October 26, 2015

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Clandestine removal of goods - pages / records seized during search - onus to prove - Only for the reason that M/s Arhat an unregistered unit issued few invoices under same serial number cannot be interpreted to the extent that the goods manufactured by M/s SUTPL were cleared under the invoice of M/s Arhat. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Clandestine removal - Goods cleared without issuing invoices and CE duty was leviable on those goods - admission by the party itself - admissible evidences or not - In...

  2. 100% EOU - Clandestine removal - case of the department is on the ground that deemed export clearance were not genuine and were shown only on paper - The entire case of...

  3. The Calcutta High Court considered a case involving the clandestine removal of wire rods and the levy of a penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The...

  4. Clandestine removal - CENVAT credit Demand - Penalty - shortage of goods - Mere signing of the chart alleging removal of finished goods cannot be treated as clear...

  5. The High Court analyzed evidence in a case involving dishonored cheques. The court emphasized the need to rebut the presumption u/s 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act....

  6. Reversal of CENVAT Credit - capital goods cleared as scrap - The appellant, being an output service provider, was not required to pay any amount in terms of rule 3(5A)...

  7. Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

  8. Clandestine Removal - reliability of statements - sufficiency of evidence or not - In a serious case such as evasion of duty by fraud, the degree of appreciation of...

  9. The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

  10. Application u/s 197 for issuance of a Lower Deduction of Tax Certificate - The High Court observed that, a plain reading of Rule 28-AA makes it clear that the...

  11. Refund of CENVAT Credit - export goods or not - goods were cleared by the appellant, not for physical exports, but were cleared by them to their sister concern, who is...

  12. Clandestine removal - Invoices pink coloured [Duplicate for transporter] are found in factory, hence, it can also be inferred logically that goods were not transported...

  13. Levy of Penalty - Perusal of Rule 26 makes it abundantly clear that unless and until there is sufficient evidence about the mens area/ intent on the part of the...

  14. Clandestine removal - evasion of duty - clearance of branded Khaini - burden to prove on Revenue - Ultimately, the High court concurred with the majority view of the...

  15. Recovery/reversal of credit - Export of Goods - Credit was availed under Rule 16 on returned Goods - The view taken by the authorities below is that reversal of the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates