Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2017 Year 2017 This

Applicability of provision of Rule 16B and 16C of CER, 2002 - ...

Central Excise

June 19, 2017

Applicability of provision of Rule 16B and 16C of CER, 2002 - permission to clear the goods under provisions of Rule 16B without payment of duty to their sister concern - The provision of rule 16-B of Central Excise Rules are in the nature of facilitation for movement of further activity, which should not be denied for technicalities

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refusal to grant of permission to remove the goods for further processing under Rule 16C of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - The order does not mention any specific...

  2. Rejection of permission to remove the goods for further processing under Rule 16C of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - permission under Rule 16C is not legally sustainable. - AT

  3. Penalty under rule 26 of the CER, 2002 can be imposed on a person only when it is proved beyond doubt that the person dealing with excisable goods knew or had reason to...

  4. Penalty u/r 27 of CER 2002 - Delay in submitting ARE-1 Applications against export of goods - contravention of Rule 19 of CER 2002 - The delay caused is nothing but...

  5. Refund - Only the permission from the Asst. Commissioner was received late. Since the permission was not received in time they cleared the goods on payment of duty. Had...

  6. As per Notification 14/2002 the Mahape unit has cleared the goods after satisfying the condition i.e in availing CENVAT credit on inputs/capital goods. Therefore, goods...

  7. Levy of penalty under Rule 25 of CER, 2002 – issuing invoices without accompanying the goods - appellant not dealt with the excisable goods at all. The penalties on the...

  8. Confiscation of goods under Rule 25 of CE Rules 2002 – redemption fine in lieu of confiscation was not imposable when goods were allowed to be cleared - AT

  9. Warehousing - Rejection of request for permission under Rule 4(4) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 to store excisable goods out side the factory premises without payment of...

  10. Rule 18 of CER 2002 – Rebate of duty – CBEC has relaxed the condition of export of tea direct from factory – Rebate claims under Rule 18 should be sanctioned - CGOVT

  11. Imposition of penalty u/r 25 - CENVAT credit - Even though the goods are not confiscated there is clear contravention of the provisions of the Rules/Notifications as...

  12. Imposition of penalty u/r 26(2) of CER, 2002 - CENVAT Credit - Wrong availment of credit and reversal thereof on being pointed out before the issue of SCN - maximum...

  13. 100% EOU - Remission of duty - Rule 21 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - remission is allowed on the goods which were cleared for export but could not be exported due to accident.

  14. Import of Zircon - Whether Zircon is “Ore“ - Zircon Ore and Concentrate - Permission to clear goods in question without payment of CVD - permission granted - HC

  15. Applicability of Rule 8(3A) of the CER, 2002 - prospective or retrospective - the rule is substantive in character since it relates to payment terms regarding duty and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates