Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2017 Year 2017 This

Transfer of case u/s 147 - Deemed service of notice u/s 148 - AO ...


Jurisdiction Transfer u/ss 147 and 148 Invalid; AO Lacks Jurisdiction, Section 292BB Inapplicable. Procedural Compliance Insufficient.

December 2, 2017

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Transfer of case u/s 147 - Deemed service of notice u/s 148 - AO never acquired jurisdiction over the assessee. Therefore, section 292BB does not come to the aid of the Department. Compliances would not bestow jurisdiction on the AO, once such jurisdiction never lay with the Assessing Officer to begin with - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

  2. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - transfer of case u/s 127 - jurisdiction of AO for reassessment - the issue to lack of jurisdiction can be raised at any stage in a case...

  3. Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

  4. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to lack of valid sanction as required u/s 151. The competent authority must independently apply its mind based on...

  5. The case involves the reopening of assessment u/s 147 to determine if the assessee is a non-filer. Reopening was based on a survey operation at a hotel owned by the wife...

  6. Territorial jurisdiction of AO - As soon as the ITO realized that he lacked pecuniary jurisdiction over the assessee, the case was immediately transferred to the file of...

  7. Notice issued u/s 148 - Transfer of a case - The order passed by CIT transferring jurisdiction from ITO, New Delhi on 04-01-2010, subsequent action of the AO i.e. ITO...

  8. Validity of reopening u/s 147 r.w.s. 148 - The Tribunal found that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer (AO) for reopening the assessment under section 147/148...

  9. The case pertains to the assumption of jurisdiction u/ss 147/148 read with section 151 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) wrongly assumed jurisdiction u/s...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - addition of unexplained investment in property u/s 69 - firstly the AO who records the reasons and issues a...

  11. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Validity of approval u/s 151 - notice not issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) - There is no concurrent jurisdiction for Joint...

  12. The HC upheld the Appellate Tribunal's decision that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid. Although Explanation 1 to Section 147 states that mere production of...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Jurisdiction - objections were raised by the assessee u/s 124(3) of the Act, within one month of receipt of notice u/s 148 of the Act...

  14. The ITAT held that reopening assessment against a deceased person, a non-existing company converted into LLP, is invalid. The company's status as "dissolved" on MCA data...

  15. The assessment reopening u/s 147 read with Section 148 was found to be unsustainable due to the lack of independent application of mind by the Commissioner of Income Tax...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates