Applications u/s 264 for revision in favor of assessee - ...

Income Tax

December 8, 2017

Applications u/s 264 for revision in favor of assessee - Condonation of delay - Proviso to Sub-Section (3) of Section 264 confers a statutory power on the Commissioner to condone the delay. Therefore it was not necessary for the Commissioner to have taken recourse to Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Applications u/s 264 for revision in favor of assessee - ...

Income Tax

December 8, 2017

You may also like:

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - petitioner has not waived his appellate right - delay of 2 years, 10 months and 8 days can not be condoned - HC

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - condonation of delay in filing an application - in terms of the proviso to Section 264 (3), the PCIT should also examine whether...

Reasonable cause for the delay in filing the revision application before the CIT under Section 264 - HC

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - It is manifest that only suo-motu power of the Commissioner under Section 264 of the IT Act, is restricted against an order...

Revision power u/s 264 - CIT committed a manifest error in exercising revisional power when petitioner's appeal was pending before CIT (Appeals) - HC

Revision application u/s 264 to get refund - application by amalgamated company - order of CIT rejecting the application is erroneous - refund allowed u/s 237 - Tri

Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because it was not accompanied by the requisite fee of Rs.500/- An opportunity should be given to cure the same - HC

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - the appeal of the Assessee has not been disposed on merits. In view of this, there was no bar to the CIT in exercising...

Revision u/s 264 - Petitioners after dismissal of the earlier petition by this Court against the same assessment order without filing any statutory Appeal before the CIT...

Power of CIT u/s 264 - Revision in favor of assessee - Power under Section 264 of the Act, is wide enough, to include rectification of a “bonafide” error committed by an...

Quick Updates: