Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2018 Year 2018 This

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - apart from a mere sentence that there is ...

Service Tax

August 8, 2018

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - apart from a mere sentence that there is prima facie case of suppression of facts and intention to evade payment of service tax, there is no evidence discussed in the impugned order as to what is the suppression on the part of the appellant. - No penalty.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Imposition of penalties - Mere collection and delay to remit to the Government cannot be considered as an act of suppression - The penalty imposed u/s 78 is unwarranted.

  2. Waiver of pre deposit - cenvat credit - duty paying documents - supplementary invoice - payment of duty due to fraud, suppression of facts etc. - prima facie case is...

  3. Penalty u/s 78 - suppression of facts - when mandatory penalty is imposable, whether the duty is paid before issue of show cause notice or after notice cannot alter the penalty.

  4. Imposition of penalty - Advertisement Agency Service - non-payment of Service tax - Section 78 - when the first SCN was issued, the subsequent SCN cannot allege...

  5. Imposition of penalty u/s 78 of FA, 1994 - mere failure to take registration or mere non-filing of returns cannot be considered as suppression of facts - penalty waived...

  6. Levy of penalty u/s 78 of FA - Since the elements of fraud, mis-statement or suppression of facts etc. with an intent to evade service tax are not present in the matter...

  7. Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

  8. Penalty u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - No malafide can be attributed to the respondent, who is organized under Government of India - No penalty.

  9. Penalty - There was sufficient evidence to establish that the respondent is guilty of suppression of facts - The law laid u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 mandates imposition of...

  10. Penalty u/s 70, 77 and 78 of FA - non-filing of ST-3 return would not amount to suppression of facts, with intent to defraud Government revenue, unless it is...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates