Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee was under mistaken belief ...

Income Tax

April 3, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee was under mistaken belief that land sold being agricultural land is not susceptible to tax - since the assessee has demonstrated that the bonafide circumstances existed for non-inclusion of the capital gains, no penalty is leviable

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee was under mistaken belief ...

Income Tax

April 3, 2019

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – assessee has bonafide belief in making the claim that gain arising out of sale of agricultural land is exempt from tax - no penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - profits from sale and purchase of agricultural land shown as capital gain instead of profits and gains from business - No penalty - AT

Nature of land sold - sale of agricultural land or not - it is nowhere necessary for an assessee to prove carrying out actual agricultural activity of the land

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Gain on sale of land - Bona-fine belief that the land under consideration was an agricultural land only - No mala-fide intention could be...

Penalty for concealment of income u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act - Claim of capital loss as bad debt - bonafide belief - no penalty - HC

Capital gain on sale of land - Nature of land - it is undisputed fact that assessee has sold agricultural land on which he was carrying out agricultural activities prior...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) – assessee in bona fide belief that Dharmada collections were not part of its income but were diverted by an overriding title towards...

Gains arising on sale of Agricultural land – Assessee might not have paid agricultural income-tax but is paying land revenue and village records clearly showed the land...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because, the assessee did not preferred any appeal against the said disallowance does not make it an inadvertent mistake - penalty confirmed - AT

Quick Updates: