Oppression and mismanagement - removal of minority directors - ...

Allegations of oppression and mismanagement in company over minority directors' removal; highlights minority shareholders' legal protections.

August 23, 2019

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of minority directors - the second respondent, though holding 70 per cent. of shareholding, cannot act arbitrary against the interests of minority shareholders (petitioners), who are none else than his family members.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of minority directors - ...

Allegations of oppression and mismanagement in company over minority directors' removal; highlights minority shareholders' legal protections.

August 23, 2019

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

You may also like:

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of MD/Director - in the notice there was an agenda for removal of 1st respondent as Managing Director and not director -...

The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

Oppression and mismanagement - Removal of Director - Period of limitation - Time gap of 5 years - The petition filed by the petitioner is prima facie barred by...

Allegation of oppression and mismanagement - The decision of the majority would prevail in the interest of the Company and its shareholders per se. Therefore, he cannot...

The crux of the matter revolves around allegations of oppression, mismanagement, illegal sale of company land, allotment of equity shares, appointment and removal of...

Oppression and Mismanagement - minority shareholders - There was no alternative except liquidation or revival of company through other modes including sale of assets to...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Allegations of financial mismanagement and irregularities by the promoters/directors - The High court acknowledged that despite the...

Oppression and mismanagement - the petitioner has been removed as a Director illegally without following due course of law. Further, the Company is in the nature of...

Mintainability of a company petition u/s 399 of the Companies Act, 1956, focusing on the pre-conditions envisaged under sub-sections (1) and (3). It examines whether the...

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of the Petitioner from the Directorship - the instant Company Petition is maintainable U/s.241 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the...

Oppression and mismanagement - appellant has no inherent right to continue as Managing Director/Director in the 1st respondent unless he is able to carry the majority...

NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the NCLT's discretionary waiver of eligibility criteria under Section 244(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal considered...

Oppression and Mismanagement - once the Company against which the aforesaid application has been filed by the appellant on the allegation that there is mismanagement in...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Oppression and mismanagement - Holding BOD meetings outside India - Nothing is shown that there is any restriction on the place where Board of Directors should hold...

Quick Updates: