Petitioner challenged order u/s 73 of Odisha Goods and Services ...

Petitioner's reply to be considered before initiating tax recovery proceedings under GST Act.

January 3, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

Petitioner challenged order u/s 73 of Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. HC held Section 61(2) requires consideration of explanation furnished. Section 61(3) states if no satisfactory explanation is given, proper officer may initiate action u/s 73. Initiation of proceeding u/s 73 was without jurisdiction. Impugned order quashed. Petitioner's reply dated 29.07.2021 to be dealt with u/s 61, thereafter revenue can proceed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petitioner challenged order u/s 73 of Odisha Goods and Services ...

Petitioner's reply to be considered before initiating tax recovery proceedings under GST Act.

January 3, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Cancellation of GST registration violated petitioner's constitutional right to carry on business. Respondent should have initiated legal action for alleged fraud instead...

Challenge to the State GST authorities demanding input tax credit availed by the petitioner along with interest and penalty for IGST paid on manpower supply services...

Excess stock found during survey at petitioner's business premises triggered initiation of proceedings u/s 130 of GST Act. Court held if excess stock is found,...

The High Court held that once a proper officer initiates proceedings on a subject matter under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) or the Haryana...

Petition challenging SCN demanding IGST paid on manpower supply services received by petitioner. Court held State GST Authorities had already initiated proceedings...

The Court rejected the petitioner's challenge to the show cause notice (SCN) issued u/s 74 of the CGST Act on jurisdictional grounds. The petitioner failed to submit a...

Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return...

Attachment of property of the partnership firm - Recovery of Service post GST era - The High Court observed that, as regards taxes which had not been recovered, it...

Jurisdiction - legality of parallel proceedings initiated by the Central Tax Officer and the State Tax Officer - The proceeding initiated by the petitioner is with...

Penalty proceedings under CGST Act cannot be initiated after State GST Authorities have initiated proceedings on the same subject matter. Once proceedings are initiated...

A Case of Coerced Input Tax Credit Reversal - GST recovery during search and seizure proceedings.

The Instruction issued by the Government of India (CBIC) provides guidelines for initiating recovery proceedings u/s 79 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

HC invalidated the tax recovery action against the petitioner, finding the assessment order withdrawn under Section 62(2) as a matter of legal fiction. The court...

Proper officer - Jurisdiction of Initiate investigation proceedings by the Central GST and State GST authorities simultaneously - cross-empowerment - The Court found...

The High Court addressed the issue of parallel proceedings initiated by both State and Central GST Authorities against the petitioner for the same assessment years. For...

Quick Updates: